🔗 Share this article

Iturns out he could survive defeat by Grimsby. He weathered an important continental showpiece versus a particularly poor Tottenham teams for many years. He could survive losing at home to domestic rivals, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, undermining some of the club’s best academy products, a poor winning percentage, calling the squad the worst in Manchester United history. But there was one adversary against whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to dance. If you challenge the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous Premiership defender during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning 1994-95 season, the coach took on the executive and appears to have missed. The most distracted of readers will notice the irony here: a coach who frequently berated his squad for failing in individual battles crumbling when confronted by the intense pressure and formidable presence of a England's top division's most intimidating football executives.

In truth, this whole painful saga seems to paint the director in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been tempting, based on his brief stint of experience with the Saints, to view Jason Wilcox as little more than a drudge within the club's structure: a man who owed his position as much to his close relationship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada as any demonstrable skill. How wrong everyone was. By masterfully outmanoeuvring United’s feted manager, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless a previous executive earlier, he has proved himself as one of football's true generals: a strategic mind that the club's mid-table rivals are now rightly wary.

The Strategic Clash Regarding System and Ideology

For example, this was the director who being involved in the hierarchy that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim originally, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to ditch his beloved formation. Naturally, these entreaties were resisted. However, these judgements hold greater authority when delivered by a man of a man the impeccable football pedigree he possesses, a veteran of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox might agree to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point questions may arise regarding why the coach is departing with full compensation, without any penalty clause in place. The director speaks rarely publicly, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals in football – individuals such as him – function on a plane beyond our own mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, probably all we would hear would be high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not the same as being ready to comprehend it.

The Supreme Power In Command

Naturally, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the true genius behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, merely executing the directives of his superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has emphasized his desire for a back four. It is reported, the owner has also proposed deploying the forward as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for United to adopt analytics and analytics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit early in his minority ownership, he announced that the team's approach to football “shall be decided by this group”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is a specialist in this technical footballing stuff, leveraging his background in petrochemicals and sailing. Above all he is incredibly rich, and it is known, the wealthy are the best of us: more insightful, more wise, strategically brilliant, simply better. Who else could one trust to oversee a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the construction of a new stadium that appears a lot like an abstract design, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

The Modern Soccer Order: Directors Above Managers

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels football. For decades, clubs foolishly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, talent spotters – players themselves. Perhaps it was once feasible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with ideas and drive to go into an organization and implement their plan through to completion. But how many companies have such individuals established? What number of mass redundancies have they managed? Better by far to place genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to decide the strategy by the directors and hire someone who will adapt their methods to suit. If coaches were formerly chefs, they have become more like Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the product, yet ultimately answerable should it be delivered poorly or leaks out of the box.

Nowadays, their job is increasingly not about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face for a club they can do little to change. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and wins two medium-sized trophies, and essentially gets sacked for speaking out. A manager at Celtic finds his standing damaged while the people who hired him continue to make errors indefinitely.

The Neoliberal Game: Responsibility Only for the Coaches

And perhaps in a small way this is simply corporate governance at work: the elevation of a gilded elite who can never be wrong, whose choices are always sacrosanct, whose mistakes can invariably be sacked away without justification. Appoint the system coach only to fire him for playing too much 3-4-3. Hire the project manager and later discard him for requiring excessive time. And above all be grateful; for your modest season ticket price rises, for your new summer signings, for the reality that the grownups – however well qualified – remain in control.